Skip to content

PROOF

Real results. Real confidence.

Blind-tested. Log-verified. Field-proven. Globally deployed. DXPLR’s technology is independently validated against real exploration programs — confirming mineralization and hydrocarbon presence before drilling.

KEY VALIDATION HIGHLIGHTS

Proven in real exploration programs, across minerals and hydrocarbons.

  • 90%+

    mineralization accuracy across independent blind tests

  • 90%+

    overall hydrocarbon validation, confirmed against well logs

  • ±30 m

    depth accuracy tolerance

  • +3,000 m

    validated detection depth

  • ~4 weeks

    typical decision cycle — weeks, not years

  • 100%

    blind-test methodology on every validation

FROM PREDICTION TO PROOF

Independent results. Measurable comparisons.

DXPLR’s blind validation program compares predictions made before access to operator drilling results with subsequently disclosed subsurface evidence. Explore selected minerals and hydrocarbon cases to see how predicted target locations, depths and relative responses compare with conventional exploration results.

Silver blind test results, Latin America, 2026. A cut-away of the ground beneath a drill rig marks DXPLR’s three predicted silver targets: primary, 320–450 m (130 m thick); secondary, 620–796 m (176 m thick); and deep continuity, 870–1,000 m, open at depth. Beside it, DXPLR’s predicted silver response and the operator’s drill log of actual silver grades peak at matching depths. Results: 93.85% overall validation, 3 of 3 target zones confirmed, and 100% barren area identification, validated against operator drill logs within the study criteria; depth agreement assessed against a pre-agreed ±30 m tolerance.
Hydrocarbon blind test results, Latin America, 2026. A cut-away of the ground beneath a drilling rig marks six predicted net pay zones, L12 to L17, between 939 and 2,520 m. DXPLR’s predicted hydrocarbon response and the operator’s well log show the six zones at matching depths, and a table compares each zone’s predicted depth, thickness and category with the operator’s. Results: 6 of 6 net pay zones identified (100% zone detection); 5 of 6 categories matched exactly (83% agreement); ±30 m depth validation tolerance; one mismatch, L16, predicted medium and verified high.
COMMISSION A BLIND TEST →

OUR BLIND TEST METHODOLOGY

How we validate.

Every validation follows a rigorous, independent process to ensure objectivity and reliability.

  1. 1

    Blind prediction

    DXPLR receives only coordinates. No log data.

  2. 2

    Time-stamped output

    Predictions are delivered and time-stamped.

  3. 3

    Partner drill program

    The partner provides logs and assays.

  4. 4

    Correlation

    Predictions are correlated with actual results.

  5. 5

    Joint validation

    Results are reviewed and validated with the client.

  6. 6

    Final report

    A comprehensive validation report is delivered.

How to commission a blind test.

  1. 01

    SUBMIT COORDINATES

    Identify a historical or known site (2-5 wells) and provide only the surface GPS coordinates; withhold all core, wireline and intercept data.

  2. 02

    TIME-STAMPED BLIND INVERSION

    DXPLR executes the satellite-based frequency-resonance sweep. Within 10-14 days, we deliver a time-stamped report forecasting target presence, depth and thickness.

  3. 03

    JOINT UNBLINDING & SCORING

    Open your legacy logs together to compare and audit our predictions against physical assays within our ±30 m tolerance.

COMMISSION A BLIND TEST →

Better investments begin before drilling.

Know more before committing capital. Tell us what you're exploring. We'll tell you whether DXPLR can help and how.

Partner with us →See the proof →